تحلیل گفتمانی مفهوم ریزوم در فلسفه دلوز با رویکرد لاکلائو و موفه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت،واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،اصفهان ، ایران

2 دانشیار مطالعات برنامه درسی،واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان ، ایران

3 استادیار گروه آموزش الهیات ، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران ، ایران

10.22061/orj.2025.12346.902

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، تحلیل تفکر " ریزوماتیک " در اندیشه فیلسوف فرانسوی" ژیل دلوز" است.به این منظور از روش پژوهش کیفی تحلیل گفتمان لاکلائو و موفه استفاده شده است .حوزه پژوهش به منابعی محدود گشته که در آن ، فلسفه ریزوماتیک دلوز مورد توجه بوده است. برای رسیدن به این منظور از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند بهره گرفته شده است و از مراحل پنج گانه تحلیل گفتمان لاکلائو و موفه برای روش تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات بهره برداری شده است.ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات شامل منابع دست اولی که به طور مستقیم مفهوم ریزوم را تبیین نموده اند، می باشد.برای ارزیابی و اعتبار پژوهش از دیدگاه کارشناسان حوزه فلسفه تعلیم وتربیت برای اطمینان بخشی به تحقیق استفاده شد. یافته های پژوهش نشان دهنده این است که ،اندیشه ریزوم ،در تقابل با اندیشه درختی قرار دارد. در پی این تقابل، ریزوم با ویژگی هایی چون ، پیوند گرایی، قلمرو زدایی، گسست نادلالتگر، کوچ گرایی، شدن و..صورت بندی می گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

An analysis of Deleuze's rhizomatic philosophy based on the discourse analysis method of Laclao and Mouffe

نویسندگان [English]

  • Habibollah Eftekhari Renani 1
  • Narges Keshtiaray 2
  • Rasool Berjisian 3
1 Eftekhari Renani,H. Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan),Esfahan,Iran
2 Associate Professor of Curriculum Studies, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 . Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this research is to analyze the "rhizomatic" thought in the thought of the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze. For this purpose, the qualitative research method of discourse analysis by Laclau and Mouffe has been used. The scope of the research has been limited to sources in which Deleuze's rhizomatic philosophy has been considered. To achieve this purpose, the purposive sampling method has been used, and the five stages of discourse analysis by Laclau and Mouffe have been used for the method of data analysis. The data collection tool includes first-hand sources that have directly explained the concept of rhizome. To evaluate and validate the research, the perspective of experts in the field of philosophy of education was used to provide assurance to the research. The research findings indicate that the idea of rhizome is in contrast to the idea of tree. Following this contrast, the rhizome is formulated with features such as connectionism, deterritorialization, non-signifying rupture, nomadism, becoming, and so on.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tree
  • Rhizome
  • Gilles Deleuze
  • Laclau and Mouffe'
  • s Discourse Analysis
Ahmad Araei N. Faraj Elahi M,Abdullah Yar. Ali (2017) Explaining the implications of Gilles Deleuze's rhizomatic thought with a view to its application in improving creativity in the Iranian educational system: Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities. No. (8(2), pp. 110-83.Persian
   Bagherinejad Z. Explanation and Criticism of the Rhizomatic Approach to Knowledge and Its Challenges for Religious Education MA Thesis: Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran.2009.Persian
Bashir, Hassan. Discourse Analysis: A Window to Discover the Unsaid. Fourth Edition. Tehran. Imam Sadeq University Press.2006.Persian.
Bayne , S. (2004) , Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces, E-learning and Digital Media, 1(2), 302-316.
Best , S & Kellner, D. Postmodern Theory. critical Interrogations. New York: Guilford press,1991
Cronje, J. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Cape Peninsula: University of Technology,2018
Deleuze, G, & Guattari, F. What is philosophy? : Columbia University Press,1994
 … Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia: Bloomsbury Publishing,1987.
 -Gregoriou , Z. (2004) ,Comenting the Rhizome:Towards a Minor Philosophy of Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory 36(4) , 233-251.
-Gough , N. Changing planes: towards a geophilosophy of transnational curriculum inquiry,2006.
Hassanifar A. Parian F. (2014) Discourse Analysis as a Method. Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Political Essays, Year 3, Issue 11, Pages 49-67.Persian.
Hejazi S. Bahrami V. (2019) Application of Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Analysis Method in Political Science Quarterly Journal of Methodology in Political Science No. 99, pp. 1-18.Persian.
 -Herzog, A. (2000). Images of thought and acts of creation: Deleuze, Bergson, and the question of cinema.
Honan, E., & Sellers, M. So how does it work?–Rhizomatic methodologies, Australian Association for Research in Education: Adelaide,2006.             
   Imanzadeh  A (2008). Study of the foundations and educational implications of Gilles Deleuze’s epistemological perspective and its critique based on Sadraei’s epistemology. Doctoral thesis: Tarbiat Modares University.Persian.
-Jabri, M .(2010) , Deleuze meets Bakhtin: "Promoting multiplicity of organizational identities" ,Second International Symposium on Process Organization Studies, Rhodes, Greece, 11-13 June.
-Malins , P. (2004), Deleuze, Guattari and an Ethico-Aesthetics of Drug Use , Janus Head. 7(1), 84-104.
Manouchehri. A. Approach and Method in Political Science. Third Edition. Tehran: Publications.2011.Persian.
-Massumi , B . A user's guide to capitalism and schizophrenia. Deviations form Deleuze and Guattari , cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Techonology ,1992.
Moghaddam. . (2011) Laclau and Mouffe's theory of discourse analysis and its critique: Journal of Cultural and Social Knowledge, Year 2, Issue 2, pp. 91-124.Persian.
Patton Paul . Deleuze and the Political. translated by Mahmoud.Rafe. first edition. Tehran. Gam Nou,2004.Persian.
Raminnia M. (2015) Rhizomatic and tree approach: two different ways of creating and reading a literary work. Adab Pajouhi Journal. No. 32, pp. 31-62.Persian
Tari, N ,Saeed Mahmoudnia, A.Poststructuralist study of the nature of the relationship between teacher and learner in the e-learning process with emphasis on Deleuze's ideas. PhD thesis.Kharazmi University.Tehran.2019.Persian
Sajjadi M. (2018). Philosophy of Technological Education or Technological Philosophy of Education Criticism of Policy-Making Discourse in the Educational System. Iran Quarterly Journal of Fundamentals of Education. No. 8, pp. 25-5.Persian
….Sajjadi M. Imanzadeh A. (2009) Investigating and Explaining the Rhizomatic Space and Its Implications in the Curriculum .Journal of Curriculum Studies. Volume 3, No. 12, pp. 48-7.Persian
….Sajadi M. Bagherinejad Z. (2011) Rhizomatic approach to knowledge and critique of its challenges for Islamic education: Journal of Islamic Education, No. 6(13), 124-144.Persian.
Semetsky, I & Lovat ,T. (2011), Bringing Deleuze’s Philosophy into Discourse on Values Education and Quality Teaching: An Australian model , Policy Futures in Education, 9(4), 485-493.
….Semetsky, I.Nomadic Education: Variations on a Theme by  Deleuze and Guattari. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers ,2008
….Semetsky, I . Deleuze, education and becoming: Brill Sense ,2006
….Semetsky, I. (2003). The problematics of human subjectivity: Gilles Deleuze and the Deweyan legacy , Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(2), 211-225.
Soltani . A (2014) The Power of Discourse and Language and the Mechanisms of Power Flow in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Tehran. Ney Publishing House. Fifth Edition.2014.Persian
….Soltani. A.(2004) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, Journal of Political Science.Persian.
-Wallin, J, A Deleuzian Approach to Curriculum, Essays on a Pedagogical Life, New York: Palgrave Macmillan ,2010