بررسی تطبیقی روش فلسفی ملاصدرا و علامه طباطبایی(ره)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش پژوه سطح 4 رشتۀ حکمت متعالیه جامعه الزهرا (س)

2 استادیار گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر ، همدان ، ایران

10.22061/orj.2025.2276

چکیده

امروزه روش‌شناسی در علوم گوناگون، مورد توجه قرار گرفته است به گونه‌ای که خود به یک زمینه پژوهشی جدی و جداگانه‌ای تبدیل شده است. این‌که هر متفکر چه روشی را برای بیان علم مورد نظر خود اتخاذ کرده، در به دست آوردن نظام حاکم بر دستاورد‌های او، انسان را یاری می‌کند. یکی از اندیشمندان و فلاسفه بزرگ و بنیان‌گذار مکتب حکمت متعالیه، ملاصدرا است که روش حاکم بر فلسفه او معرکۀ آراء قرار گرفته است؛ از طرفی علامه طباطبایی که به  فیلسوفی نوصدرائی مشهور است و توجه به روش‌شناسی ایشان نیز اهمیت دارد؛ از این‌رو مقالۀ حاضر با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی به بررسی روش‌شناسی فلسفه ملاصدرا و علامه طباطبایی می‌پردازد و مشخص می‌گردد که فلسفۀ ملاصدرا  مکتبی مستقل است و روش حاکم بر فلسفه وی، روش عقلی و برهانی است و ایشان در مقام داوری از روش برهانی یا روایات بهره جسته است؛ همچنین علامه طباطبایی(ره) از روش عقلی صرف برای بیان فلسفه استفاده می‌کردند و از نقل و وحی و شهود در فلسفه در مقام گردآوری استفاده کرده‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of the Philosophical Method of Mulla Sadra and Allameh Tabatabai (RA)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Naima Najminejad 1
  • Yahya Nurmohammadi Najafabadi 2
1 Level 4 scholar of Transcendental Wisdom, Al-Zahra Society
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Malayer University
چکیده [English]

Today, methodology has been given attention in various sciences in such a way that it has become a serious and separate research field. What method each thinker adopts to express his desired science, helps man in obtaining the system that governs his achievements. One of the great thinkers and philosophers and the founder of the transcendental school of wisdom is Mulla Sadra, whose method governing his philosophy has become a battle of opinions. On the other hand, Allameh Tabataba'i, who is famous as a neo-Sadra philosopher, and paying attention to his methodology is also important; Therefore, the present article examines the methodology of the philosophy of Mulla Sadra and Allameh Tabataba'i with a descriptive-analytical method and it is clear that the philosophy of Mulla Sadra is an independent school and the method that governs his philosophy is the rational and evidential method, and he uses the evidential method or traditions as a judge. is a search; Also, Allameh Tabatabai (RA) used a purely rational method to express philosophy and used narration, revelation and intuition in philosophy as a compilation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Methodology
  • Mulla Sadra
  • Neo Sadraian
  • Burhani Method
Hakimi , M, 1991, Divine Theology and Human Theology, Dalil Ma, Qom, Persian.
Jafari , A, Philosophical Research Methodology , Phoenix , Tehran, Persian.
Javadi Amoli , A , 2007 , Raheeq Makhtoum, Esra, Qom, Persian
Qur'an,  Isra, Qom, Persian.
Rashad , A , 1998 , New Sadra'i Philosophical Discourse , Qobsat , No. 10 and 11, Persian.
Sobhani , J, 1387, Book of Philosophy Month , No. 18 , Persian.
Suhravardi , Sh , 2013, Hekmeh al-Ishraq , Institute of Strategic Studies and Research , Tehran, Arabic.
Shirvani , A , 1388, The Possibility of Intuitive Philosophy, Khrodnameh Sadra, No. 55, Persian.
Sadr al-Malhain , M , 1981 , Al-Hikama al-Muttaaliyyah fi al-Asfar al-Aqliyyah al-Qarad, Dar Ihyaya al-Tarath al-Arabi , Beirut, Arabic.
..........................................., 1975 , Al-Mubadad and Al-Maad , Iranian Philosophy and Wisdom Society, Tehran. Arabic.
.........................................., 1984a , Al-Mashir , Tahori , Tehran, Arabic.
..........................................., Bita , al-Hashiyah Ali al-Hiyat Al-Shafa , Bidar , Qom, Arabic.
.........................................., 1987, Tafsir al-Qur'an al-Karim , Bidar , Qom, Arabic.
..........................................., 1961, treatise on three principles , Tehran Movable and Beshen University, Tehran, Arabic.
..........................................., 2004 , Al-Kafi's description of principles , Institute of Cultural Studies and Research, Tehran, Arabic.
........................................., 1999, collection of philosophical essays of Sadrul Matalhin , Hikmat , Tehran, Arabic.
........................................, 1984b , Mofatih al-Ghaib , Institute of Studies and Cultural Research , Tehran, Arabic.
Aboudit , A , 2015, Introduction to Nizam Hikmat Sadraei, Imam Khomeini Institute (RA), Qom, Persian.
................................, 2018 , Ontology , Imam Khomeini Institute, Qom, Persian.
Fanai, M , 2014 A , Some Contemporary Islamic Philosophers in the Seminary, Islamic Wisdom, Qom, Persian.
...................................., 2016 , an introduction to the history of Islamic philosophy , Imam Khomeini Institute (dir) , Qom, Persian.
..................................., 2014b, an introduction to contemporary Islamic philosophy , Imam Khomeini Institute., Qom, Persian.
Kayseri , D , 2005, Sharh Fuss al-Hakm , Bostan Kitab, Qom , Arabic.
Mesbah Yazdi , M , 2004 , Teaching Philosophy, International Publishing Company, Tehran , Persian.
......................................., 2012 , Commentary on the end of wisdom , Imam Khomeini Institute , Qom , Persian.
......................................., 2006 , Philosophical round table (9) Philosophy and Religion , Philosophical Knowledge, 30, No. 11 , Persian.
Motahari , M , 2005 , collection of works , Sadra, Qom, Persian.
Minagar, Gh , 2013, Methodology of Sadrul Matalhin, Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, Tehran, Persian.
Yazdan Panah , Y, 2018 , Reflections on the philosophy of Islamic philosophy, Kitab Farda, Qom, Persian.
..........................., 2020 , Coordinates of transcendental wisdom , Al-Ahmad Publications, Qom, Persian.
Soleimani Amiri , A, the 99th meeting of the scientific group of philosophy with the topic of "the proper method of philosophy" Wednesday 9 February 2012 at the Supreme Council of Islamic Wisdom), Persian.