تبیین یقین‌بخشی برهان نظم از طریق «استدلال انباشتی»، در سایه تحلیل معناشناختی «یقین»

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری دانشگاه تهران، و طلبه سطح 4 حوزه علمیه قم. مربی دروس معارف دانشگاه تهران

2 عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه تهران و استاد سطوح عالی حوزه علمیه قم

10.22061/orj.2024.2185

چکیده

اندیشمندان و فلاسفه اسلامی همواره عنایت ویژه‌ای به اثبات عقلانی مبدأ متعال داشته‌اند. برهان نظم یکی از این براهین است که از جایگاه و اهمیت بی‌بدیلی در خداشناسی برخوردار بوده و در متون دینی بسیار مورد تاکید قرار گرفته‌است. بیان مسئله: لیکن برخی به‌دلیل ادعای عدم احراز یقین‌آفرینی در برهان نظم، برهانیّت آن را نپذیرفته و آن را از شمار براهین اثبات مبدأ متعال کنار نهاده‌اند. ازاین‌رو تحقیق حاضر با روش تحلیل مفهومی، گزاره‌ای و سیستمی ضمن بازخوانی و تحلیل معناشناختی «یقین منطقی بالمعنی الأخص» و «یقین روان‌شناختی بالمعنی الأعم»، با بررسی برخی تقاریر برهان نظم، در صدد پاسخ به مسئله امکان یقین‌بخشی برهان نظم به معنای حقیقی و منطقی، و بررسی جایگاه و میزان ضرورت برهان نظم در مباحث فلسفی و الهیاتی می‌باشد. دستیافت‌ها: تحقیق حاضر در رویکرد نوآورانه‌ای با اثبات اعتبار و یقین‌آوری استدلال انباشتی از لحاظ منطقی و فلسفی، آن را مبنایی معتبر و عقلانی برای افادة یقین حقیقی در برهان نظم و نه صرفا اطمینان‌بخشی آن، قرار می‌دهد، چراکه استدلال انباشتیِ منطوی در برهان نظم هم‌پایة با متواترات، از یقینیات و باورهای پایه‌ای محسوب می‌شود که ذهن بشر به‌بداهت، آن را تصدیق کرده و تشکیک در آن، سفسطه را در پی خواهد داشت. ثانیا برهان نظم با توجه مشهودبودن و اتقان فلسفی، از جایگاه مهمی در براهین اثبات مبدأ متعال برای تمام سطوح بشری برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Certainty of the Proof of Order Through "Accumulation Reasoning", in the Shadow of the Semantic Analysis of "Certainty"

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Norouzi 1
  • Seyed Mojtaba Mirdamadi 2
1 PhD student of Tehran University, and 4th level student of Qom Seminary. Teacher of education courses at University of Tehran
2 A member of the faculty of Tehran University and a professor of higher levels at Qom Seminary
چکیده [English]

Islamic thinkers and philosophers have always paid special attention to the rational proof of the supreme principle. Argument of order is one of these arguments that has an irreplaceable position and importance in theology and has been emphasized a lot in religious texts. But some have not accepted its proof due to the claim of not establishing certainty in the proof of order, and have excluded it from the number of proofs of the supreme origin. Therefore, the present research with the method of conceptual, propositional and systemic analysis, while re-reading and semantic analysis of "logical certainty in the special sense" and "psychological certainty in the general sense", by examining some interpretations of the proof of order, aims to answer the question of the possibility of providing certainty in the proof of order in the true sense and logical, and examining the place and necessity of order proof in philosophical and theological discussions.In an innovative approach, by proving the validity and certainty of the cumulative argument from a logical and philosophical point of view, the present research makes it a valid and rational basis for expressing real certainty in the proof of order and not merely its assurance, because the cumulative argument implied in the proof of order is consistent with mutavaterat. It is one of the basic certainties and beliefs that the human mind readily acknowledges and doubting it will lead to sophistry. Secondly, due to its obviousness and philosophical mastery, the proof of order has an important place in proofs of the supreme origin for all human levels.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Order Proof
  • Cumulative Reasoning
  • Intelligent Design
  • Logical Certainty
  • Psychological Certainty

مراجع

Holy Quran
Nahj al-Balagha
Afzali J, [ Certainty; background, types and definitions]. Journal of Intellectual knowledge. 2008; 10. Persian.
Ahmadi M, [ evolution and intelligent design; The review of Richard Dawkins and Anthony Flo's views on the proof of order]. Journal of New religious thought. 2022; 71.Persian.
Alousi M, Rouh Al- Ma,ani, Beirut, Daro Al- Ehya Al-Torath Al-Arabi. 1999. Arabic.
Ameli A, Explaining the proofs of God. Qom: Isra; 2005. Persian.
Arefi A, [ Knowledge and types of certainty ]. Journal of Intellectual knowledge. 2009; 14. Persian.
Bahmanyar I, Al- Tahsil, corrected by Morteza Motahari. Tehran: University of Tehran; 1970. Persian.
Dibaj M, [ Translation of About certainty]. Wittgenstein L (Author). Tehran: Tandis; 2001. Persian.
Farabi M, Al- Manteqiat, Tahqiqe Mohammad Taghi Danesh Pajooh, Qom, Ketabkhane Ayatollah Marashi Najafi. 1988. Arabic.
Fayoumi A, Al Mesbah Al- Monir, Qom, Dar Al Hejra.1984. Arabic.
Ghazali A, Me,eyar Al- Elm, Tas,hihe Ali Bu Molhem, Beirut, Dar va Maktaba Al- Hilal. 2000. Arabic.
Golshani, [ does religious science have meaning]. Journal of District and University Quarterly. 1998; 17. Persian.
Heli H, Al- Asrar Al- Khafiyyah fi Uloom al- Aqliyyah, Qom, Daftare Tablighate Eslami. 2000. Arabic.
Heli H, Kashf al-Murad fi Sharhe Tajrid Al- Eteghad, Qom, Jame,e Al- Modarresin. 2021. Arabic.
Heli H, Nahayat Al- Vosoul ela Elm Al- Osoul, Qom, Moassese Imam al- Sadeq Alayhe Al- Salam. Beta. Arabic.
Hosseinzadeh M, [ An epistemological look at frequent propositions in Islamic thought ]. Journal of Theological knowledge. 2008; 4(2). Persian.
Ibn Arabi M, Rasaaele Ibn Arabi, Tahghighe Saeed Abdul Fattah, Beirut, Entesharate Al-Arabi .2004. Arabic.
Ibn Sina H, Al-Isharat va Al- Tanbihat, Sharhe Nasir al-Din Al- Tusi, Tehran, Dafhtare Nashre Ketab. 1982. Arabic.
Ibn Sina H, Rasail fi ahwal al-nafs, Tahghighe Ahmad Fowad Al-Ahwani, Egypt, Daro Al- ehya Al-Kitab al-Arabi. 1952. Arabic.
Ibn Sina H, The proof of healing, translated by Mehdi Qavam Safari. Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought; 2012. Persian.
Johari L, Al- Sahah, Taj Al-Logha and Sahah al-Arabiyyah, Beirut, Dar al- Elam Lel Malayin 1984.. Arabic.
Kelein. P. D. Certainty, in a Companion to Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998..
Mahdavi Hosseini; [ The calculation of probabilities does not apply to metaphysics ]. Journal of Specialized Journal of Islamic Speech. 2011; 40. Persian.
Mirdamad M, Taqvim Al- Iman va Shahoh, Tahqiqe Ali Oujabi, Tehran, Motaleate Eslamie Daneshgahe Tehran. 1997. Arabic.
Misbah Yazdi M, [ the truth of science]. Journal of Qabsat. 1999; 12. Persian.
Mohammadzadeh M, [ The validity and function of probability calculation from the point of view of Shahid Sadr ]. Journal of Culture of research. 2015; 20 and 21. Persian.
Motahari M, The Collection of Books. Tehran: Sadra;1994. Persian.
Motahari M, Philosophical articles. Tehran: Sadra; 2007. Persian.
Nowrozi A, [ The approach of "combination of doubt" in the review of hadith documents, and a critique of the school of scholars of Mohagheg Khoi ]. Journal of Hadith study. 2023; 30. Persian.
Rabbani Golpayegani A, [ The law of probabilities and the principle of senkhite in the proof of order ]. Journal of New Theological Teachings Quarterly. 2017; 1. Persian.
Ragheb H, Mofradat Al- Alfaz Al- Quran Al- Karim, Tahghighe Safvan Adnan Davoudi, Dameshgh, Dar al- Qalam. 1995. Arabic.
Ramin F, [ Evaluating the use of probability calculus in order proof, based on Mohammad Baqer Sadr's presentation ]. Journal of Scientific and Research Quarterly of Qom University. Beta; 4. Persian.
Razi F, Al-Mabahes al-Mashraghiyya, Qom, Bidar. 1990. Arabic.
Razi Q, Sharh Al- Matareh Al- Anwar fi al- Mantegh, Qom, Entesharate Najafi. Beta. Arabic.
Razi Q, Tahrir Al- Qavaed Al- Mantiqiyah fi Sharh al- Rasael al-Shamsiyah, Tehran, Bidar. 2015. Arabic.
Sabzevari M, Asrar Al- Hekam, Qom, Matbooate Dini. 2014. Arabic.
Sadr al- Din Shirazi M, Al- Hekmat Al- Mutaaliyyah fi Al- Asfar al- Arabah Al-Aqliyyah, Beirut, Dar Al- Ehya Al- Torath Al- Arabi. 1981. Arabic.
Sadr M, Al- Mursel va Al- Rasoul va Al-Rasalah, Beirut, Dar Al- Taarof le Al- Matbouat. 1991. Arabic.
Sadr M, Osos Al- Manteqiah le Al- Esteqra, Qom, Dar al- Sadr. 2011. Arabic.
Salavati A, [ Deducing different models of certainty with regard to the internal possibilities of transcendental wisdom ]. Journal of The Mirror of Knowledge. 2019; 58. Persian.
Shahabi M, Leader of wisdom, part of logic. Tehran: Unplaced; 1961. Persian.
Sobhani J, Al- Vasit fi Osoul Al- Feqh, Qom, Moassese Imam al- Sadeq Alayhe Al- Salam. 2009. Arabic.
Suhravardi S, Collection of Books, edited by Dr. Najaf Ali Habibi. Tehran: Institute of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies; 2001. Persian.
Suhravardi S, Talwihat al- Louhiya va al- Arshiyah, Tahghighe Najaf Qoli Habibi, Tehran, Moassese Hekmat va Phalsafe Iran. 2009. Arabic.
Tabatabai M, Nahayat Al- Hekmah, Qom, Jame,e Modarresin Hozeh Elmiyye Qom. 1995. Arabic.
Tabatabai M, The principles of philosophy and the method of realism, introduction and footnote by Morteza Motahari. Tehran: Sadra; 2008. Persian.
Tousi N, Usaf al- Ashraf, Tahghighe Seyyed Mohammad Reza Ghiasi Kermani, Qom,Moassese Hozur. 2003. Arabic.
Tusi K, Asas Al- Eqtebas, Tehran, Entesharate Daneshgahe Tehran. 1982. Arabic.
Tusi M, Oddat al- Osul, Qom, Unplaced. 1992. Arabic.
پژوهش های هستی شناختی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 06 شهریور 1403

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار