Comparative Study on: Time in Heidegger’s Existential Phenomenology and Mulla Sadra’s Ontology

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate professor, department of philosophy, central Tehran branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

Discussion on time is one of the most important issues in philosophical thought. It is a problematic issue intentionally and extensionally. The both (Mulla sadra and Heiddeger) believe that the leading task of philosophy is to explain and illuminate the truth of being. One of the phenomenon of being or key of understanding being is time. There are some differences between them in definition and domination of the being, especially Heidegger, in contrast to Mulla Sadra, distinguishes some terms like existence, being and Dasien in his philosophy. In spite of the differences, the both have focused on being and its relationship to the temporality. They try to change the physical definition into the transcendental determination of time. They interpret the different aspects of time such as past, presence and future as aspects of being and Dasien. According to Heidegger, there is an endeavor to distinguish between time, temporality, history and historicity. Finally, both of them have found the deepest relationship between being and time. This paper has tried to interpret the past and the future as the existential facts. 

Keywords

References

شیرازی، محمدبن ابراهیم (ملاصدرا)، (1990/ 1410ق، 1981)، الأسفار الأربعۀالعقلیۀ، ج 1 و 3، بیروت، دار احیاء التراث العربی.
شیرازی، محمدبن ابراهیم (ملاصدرا)، (1364)، الشواهد الربوبیه، مشهد، دانشگاه مشهد.
شیرازی، محمدبن ابراهیم (ملاصدرا)، (1362)، المفاتیح الغیب، تهران، مؤسسۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات فرهنگی.
شیرازی، محمدبن ابراهیم (ملاصدرا)، ( 1964/ 1342ق)، المشاعر، تهران، انستیتو ایرانشناسی پاریس.
شیرازی، محمدبن ابراهیم (ملاصدرا)، (1375)، مجموعه رسائل فلسفی، تحقیق حامد ناجی، تهران، حکمت.
شیرازی، محمدبن ابراهیم (ملاصدرا)، (1378)، رساله فی الحدوث، تحقیق سید حسین موسویان، تهران، بنیاد حکمت صدرا.
جمادی، سیاوش، (1387)، زمینه و زمانۀ پدیدارشناسی، تهران، ققنوس.
خاتمی، محمود، (1379)، جهان در اندیشۀ هایدگر، تهران، مؤسسۀ فرهنگی دانش و اندیشۀ معاصر.
طباطبایی، سید محمد حسین، (1362)، نهایۀ الحکمۀ، قم، مؤسسۀ نشر اسلامی.
نجفی افرا، مهدی، (1383)، حرکت و زمان در فلسفه، تهران، روزنه.
نجفی افرا، مهدی، (1389)، هستی و زمان در فلسفۀ ملاصدرا، تهران، خردنامۀ صدرا، شمارۀ 60.
هایدگر، مارتین، (1386)، هستی و زمان، سیاوش جمادی، تهران، ققنوس.     
Chernyakov, Alexei,(2002), the ontology of time,New York, kluwer academic publishers.
Inwood, Michael,(1999), a Heidegger Dictionary, oxford, U.K, Blackwell publisher Ltd.
Acikenc, Alparslan,(1993), Being and Existence in Sadra and Heidegger, kualalumpur, international institute of Islamic thought and civilization.
El-Bizri, Nader,(2000), The phenomenological quest between Avicenna and Heidegger, Binghamton , Binghamton University.
Heidegger, Martin,(1992), The concept of time, translated by William McNeill, U.K., Oxford Blackwell. 
Heidegger, Martin, (1992), History of the concept of time, translated by Theodore Kisiel, , U.S.A., Indiana university press.
Heidegger, Martin, (1968), What is called thinking? Trans, by J. Glenn Gray, New York, Harper and Row.
Heidegger, Martin, (1962), Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson, New York, Basil Blackwell.
Gorner, paul,(2007), Heidegger’s Being and Time, an introduction, New York, Cambridge university press.
Oaklander, L. Nathan, (2008), philosophy of time, vol 2, New York, rout ledge.
 
Journal of Ontological Researches
Volume 4, Issue 7 - Serial Number 7
September 2015
Pages 41-57

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics