Berlin and West Reading on the Ontological Foundations of Positive Freedom in Spinoza's Thought

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Post-Doctoral Researcher, Philosophy, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate professor, Philosophy, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate professor, Philosophy of education, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

10.22061/orj.2021.1659

Abstract

Berlin and West are the political philosophers who have analyzed the concept of positive freedom in Spinoza's thought. In trying to explain the meaning of positive freedom in Spinoza's thought, they have adopted different interpretations and insights and have reached different results. Berlin in his paper two concepts of freedom considers Spinoza's theological political treaties as root of the defense of the authoritarian and the disregard for individual liberties. While West has taken a more comprehensive approach to defending Spinoza's political thought, and with a broader analysis of the dimensions of the concept of positive freedom (ontological, ethical, and political) in Spinoza's thought, he believes that positive freedom does not necessarily lead to authoritarianism that Berlin attributes it to the political theories of rationalists such as Plato, Fichte and Hegel. In the present article, while explaining the arguments of these two thinkers about the concept of positive freedom, we will explain how true Berlin's accusations against Spinoza's political thought are. The final proposition is that Berlin's views on positive freedom stem from a reductionist approach and an incomplete reading of the concept of positive freedom in Spinoza's thought, focusing only on some of Spinoza's positions in the theological political treatise. However, the West reading is more realistic and comprehensive due to its attention to various ethical, ontological, and political dimensions.

Keywords

References

Berlin I. “The Apotheosis of the Romantic Will,” in The Crooked Timber of Humanity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991, p. 220-229.
Berlin I. “Two Concepts of Liberty”, in Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1969.
Belin I. “A Reply to David West” in Political Studies,  Political Studies Association, n. 41, 1993, p. 297-298.
Christman J. “Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom,” in Ethics 101, no. 2, 1991, p. 359-412.
Claude J. Isaiah Berlin’s Liberalism, Oxford: Clarendon, 1991, p. 85.
Crowder G. Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism Cambridge: Polity, 2004, p. 84–85.
Gray J.  Isaiah Berlin, London: HarperCollins, 1995 p.18.
Gray J.  Isaiah Berlin; and Charles Taylor, “What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty?” in Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. Robert Gooding and Philip Pettit Oxford: Blackwell; 1997. 45-60.
Lukes S. Isaiah Berlin: in Conversation with Steven Lukes, Skidmore College., 1998, p 52-134.
Macfarlane L. “On Two Concepts of Liberty,” Political Studies 14, no. 1, 1966, p. 77–81.
Macpherson C. “Berlin’s division of liberty,” in Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval, ed. C. B. Macpherson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, p. 110–13.
McCloskey J. “A Critique of the Ideals of Liberty,” Mind 74, no. 296, 1965, p. 483–508.
Meshkat M & Fazeli M, the concept of freedom of Isaiah Berlin in Occidental Studies journal, 2014, pp. 105-135
Petti Ph. The Instability of Freedom as Noninterference: the case of Isaiah Berlin, in Ethics, n. 4, 2011, pp. 693-716.
Ryan A. “Freedom,” in Philosophy 40, no. 152, 1965, p.93–112
Spinoza B. Complete Works, translated by Samuel Shirly, edited, with introduction and notes, by Michael L. Morgan, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/ Cambridge; 2002.
Simhony A. “On Forcing Individuals to be Free: T. H. Green’s Liberal Theory of Positive Freedom,” in Political Studies 39, no. 2, 1991, p. 305
Steinberg J. “Spinoza’s curious defense of toleration” in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise A Critical Guide, Edited by Yitzhak Y. Melamed and Michael A. Rosenthal, Cambridge: Cambridge university Press. 2010, p. 210-230.
West D. “Spinoza on Positive Freedom” in Political Studies, n. 41, 1993, p. 284- 296.
Ward L. 2011, “Benedict Spinoza on the Naturalness of Democracy” in Canadian Political Science Review: University of Regina, 2011, p. 55-73.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics