Roman Ingarden’s critics on Husserl Phenomenology

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate professor of art, BuAli Sina university, corresponding author

2 Ph.D candidate in philosophy of art,BuAli Sina university

Abstract

Ingarden is a realist phenomenologist who believes that Husserl in his logical investigation has accepted a kind of realism which its base is distinction between consciousness and reality. This realism dismissed with the beginning of Husserl’s transcendental idealism replaced by consciousness and transcendental Idealism. Ingarden has opposed the sudden transformation and believed that transcendental thought has its own problems in the goal and the method. He believes that the whole idealism is not logically coherent. The scheme of the conception of transcendental idealism, its goal and method raised confusion and then inconsistency. Husserl by using Epoch method ignores actuality of thing's existence and by exercising phenomenological reductionism reached the absoluteness of consciousness and transcendental ego and finally by proposing constitutional conception replaced realistic objects by meaning or noema. These tasks invalidate the real existence and has doubted Husserl’s original goal that was knowledge of objective data. Rigorous philosophy which is reached by this method confines itself to immanent perception. Ingarden has pointed to petition principia problem in Husserl's reductionist method, claims that Husserl's results in the transcendental thought is not an achievement of mere epistemology. In many cases his results is more like to metaphysical propositions which derived from ontological elements.

Keywords

References

Bel, David, (1990), Husserl, Translated by, fereidon fatemi, markaz publishing. [In Persian]
Bostar, Leo,(1994), Reading Ingarden read Husserl: Metaphysics, ontology, and phenomenological method, Volume 10, Issue 3, p 211–236.
Husserl, Edmund, (1982) collected works, Volume.2, Idea, Pertaining to a pure phenomenology, vol.1, translated by F.Kersten, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
---------------------, (2001) Logical investigations, translated by J.N.Findlay, edited by Dermot Moran, Rutledge.
…………………………, (1977) Cartesian Meditations, Translated by Abdolkarim Rashidian , Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
……………………….…, (2007), Philosophy as the Rigorous Science, Translated by Behnam Aghaee ,  Siavash Moslemi. Markaz Publishing. [In Persian]
Ingarden, Roman, (1975), On the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism, Translated from the Polish by Arnor Hannibalsson, Martinus Nijhoff  Publishers.
Laskey, Dallas, (1972), Ingarden's Criticism of Husserl, in A-T Tymieniecka (ed.), Analecta Husserliana, Vol. II. 48-54.
Mitscherling, Jeff, (1997), Roman Ingarden´s Ontology and aesthetics, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Smith, David Woodruff, (2007), Husserl, Translated by   Mohammad Taghi Shakeri, Hikmat Publishing. [In Persian]
Sokolowski, Robert, (1977), On the Motives which led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism by Roman Ingarden, in The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 74, No 3, p. 176-180.
Spiegelberg, Herbert, (1994), The Phnomenological Movment: a Historical Introduction, Translated by masoud Olia, Minoie Kherad publishing. [In Persian]
Rashidian, Abdolkarim, (2012), Husserl in the his works, Ney publishing. [In Persian]
Thomasson, Amie, (2012), Roman Ingarden, in Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy.
Zahavi, Dan, (2002), Husserl's Phenomenology, Translated by Iman Vaghefi, Ali Nejat gholami, Rozbahan Publising. [In Persian]
Journal of Ontological Researches
Volume 7, Issue 14
February 2019
Pages 143-160

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics